The Internet has been instrumental in helping bloggers
achieve success and providing the public with recent news almost instantly.
However, despite these benefits, the use of the Internet did not bring forth
only positive attributes. One major problem has been the ability to instantly
spread sensationalized news and therefore damage the reputation of those
involved.
Sidney Blumenthal (a victim of this) urged John Kerry to sue
the Sun, in a 2004 article he wrote for the Guardian. Kerry was accused of
having an affair with an intern; the story was reported by Matt Drudge of the
Drudge report and also in various British conservative papers before going
viral. Also this story became prominent right when Kerry was leading in the
polls.
This is just one example of a public figure that was wrongly
defamed. In his article Blumenthal points out that there is basically no legal
protection for public figures who are defamed by the press. This is why he
suggests to sue in a British court.
The issues raised by Blumenthal bring up a complex matter, How strict should US law be with libel laws in relation to public figures?
If the US laws were more open to public figures suing for
libel (similarly to a private citizen) they may face an overflow of lawsuits.
There are so many gossip columns and false claims made by tabloids that
celebrities would be given the opportunity to sue for libel almost daily. Some people
believe negative press is something that comes with the territory of being a
public figure.
On the other hand, in Kerry’s case these rumors may have
impacted voters opinions of him and therefore effected the results of the
election. In this case one could make the argument that Kerry’s career was
impacted by the claims made by various news outlets and perhaps he should have
the right to sue for damages.
No comments:
Post a Comment